Show simple item record

dc.coverage.spatialLatin Americaes_ES
dc.creatorLepratte, Leandro
dc.creatorBlanc, Rafael Luján
dc.creatorPietroboni, Rubén Antonio
dc.creatorHegglin, Daniel Rodolfo
dc.identifier.citationThe 22nd International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT 2013. Porto Alegre. Brasil.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThis paper explains the advancement achieved in a theoretical analytical work, developed to create a convergent framework between social studies of science and technology and the economics of innovation and technological change. It is shown here the ontological, epistemological and theoretical possibilities of convergence between both trajectories, on the basis of a special selection of contributions related to social studies of technology (Actor Network Theory, social construction of technology and socio-technical analysis) and neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economics oriented to complex systems. These include theoretical advances made by Latin American scholars that seek to interpret and explain problems of innovation, technological change and structural change taking into account the peculiarities of the region. The different analytical moments carried out are explained, as well as their implications: ontological (non deterministic dynamic conceptions), epistemological (inter-ontology crossover), theoretical (“good theory”) and general and specific approach dimensions under assumptions of midrange theories. As a result it is provided the basis of convergence and their assumptions that will allow the construction of a hybrid research program oriented to innovation problems, technological change and structural change in Latin America. It is explained their relevant hybrid research agenda: studies about socio- technical dynamics, studies about socio-technical trajectory and studies about socio-technical configurations and articulations. Finally, in line with the Latin American traditional thought on science, technology and society, the program proposes the creation of an emergent space of articulating policies to promote multidimensional development (economic growth, social inclusion and sustainability)es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.subjectSocial studies of technologyes_ES
dc.subjectComplex systemes_ES
dc.subjectNeo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economicses_ES
dc.subjectHybrid researches_ES
dc.subjectArticulating policieses_ES
dc.titleComplexity, social-technical systems and developing, a research program for Latin Americaes_ES
dc.rights.holderLepratte, Leandro ; Blanc, Rafael Luján ; Pietroboni, Rubén Antonio ; Hegglin, Danieles_ES
dc.description.affiliationFil: Lepratte, Leandro. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.affiliationFil: Blanc, Rafael Luján. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.affiliationFil: Pietroboni, Rubén Antonio. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.affiliationFil: Hegglin, Daniel Rodolfo. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewedes_ES
dc.type.snrddocunento de conferenciaes_ES
dc.relation.referencesAlbuquerque, E. M. (2007). Inadequacy of technology and innovation systems at the periphery, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, pp. 669 - 690.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAntonelli, C. (2007). The system dynamics of collective knowledge: From gradualism and saltationism to punctuated change, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62, pp. 215–236.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAntonelli, C. (2011), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesArocena, R. and Sutz J. (2003). “Knowledge, innovation and learning: systems and policies in the north and in the south”, en: Cassiolato J.; H. Lastres; M. Maciel M. (eds.), Systems of innovation and development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 291–310.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAmsdem, A. (2004). La sustitución de importaciones en las industrias de alta tecnología: Prebisch renace en Asia, Revista de la CEPAL, 82, Abril.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesArthur, B. (1990). Positive Feedbacks in the Economy, Scientific American, 262, pp. 92-99.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBerkhout, F.; A. Smith; A. Stirling (2004), “Socio-technical regimes and transition contexts”, En Elzen, B.; F.W. Geels; K. Green, K. (eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 48–75.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBijker, W. E. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs. Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Londres, MIT Press.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBrieva, S. and Thomas, H. (2008). Complementariedades y puentes inter-teóricos entre la economía del cambio tecnológico y la sociología de la tecnología. Un aporte a partir del análisis de la dinámica socio-técnica de la producción agrícola argentina. VII Jornadas Latinoamericanas de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología ESOCITE 2008.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBruun, H. and Hukkinen J. (2003). Crossing boundaries: An integrative framework for studying technological change, Social Studies of Science, 33, (1), pp. 95-116.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCalıskan, K. and Callon M. (2010). Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets, Economy and Society, 39, (1), pp. 1-32.es_ES
dc.rights.useNo comercial con fines académicos.es_ES

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess