2025-02-252022European Epistemology Conference 2022.http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/12256This work is multidisciplinary and brings together aspects of Quantum Physic chemistry, Physics, Chemistry and Epistemology/Semiotics. By exploring topics ranging from materials to design, it also seeks to elucidate the underlying connections between the natural (visible reality) and the artificial (hidden reality), and experiment and modeling. The results are intended to contain elements of discovery and surprise that often accompany the gaining of new knowledge toward a new conception of the architecture and function of the mass of matter and energy that sustains our thoughts. We conceive of Reality as everything that is detected by our senses, and especially that which is visible to our eyes, or which, aided by the development of high-tech equipment, we can detect. Nevertheless, is this reality the only one? This conception does not explain phenomena that occur in the Cosmological Nature, so my proposal is that other "Hidden" realities exist but we do not detect them, or that they simply do not exist. We can create and verify them, as scientists have been doing for centuries. Logically, the strategies (architecture) of our thoughts must differ a lot to reach them, with respect to the proven reality. This vision is far from violating the feeling of "Faith". When we trust a person and his actions, it is because we have faith in him. How can we not have faith in God, in Christ, or in any confession that we all have as human being? After "humanizing" (giving the attribution of thinking, responding, acting), to species that we do not conceive to have "Life" such as atoms, to cite one, every particle that makes up the mass of matter and energy of the Universe led me to the "creation of a New chemical species" (C-Zr-SO4H2), recently reported 1 . The humanization of chemical species took me years, and the dialogues, just as an example with one of the atomic or subatomic chemical species was: “Hello Zirconia, I come to propose a new type of relationship to link with other atoms; I am not willing to get out of my stability; I understand, I wouldn't either, but listen. Would you be able to help me by sharing two electrons with two more atoms? Not even crazy, a charge fraction, never, or one or two electrons yes, what you propose to me no! It would take me out of my emotional and bodily stability and it would destroy me....Wait, I need you as an isolated entity, as an atom, not as rust; no way!!!. I understand how oxide you are very stable and you lead a pleasant life, but if to compensate for this fraction of negative charge, I generate a link relationship with an atom that offers a huge electronic screen, and it will have no problem sharing with you the fraction you lack to have a net negative charge No!!! Look, here is the sulfate species, they are already known, and they form stable species, he is willing to share with you the 0.33 that you are missing; what do you say, what do you feel? Oh, yes, with that enormous electronic screen and with my friend Sulfate, it is something else, but how would it be? You would have two shared electrons with two carbon atoms (two electrons between three atoms, 0.66 net negative charge for each atom). Since the C (graphite phase) has four shared electrons forming a C=C double bond, with which they would share their two free electrons, remaining with two electrons forming a simple and stable C-C bond, and the missing fraction you would share with Sulfate. Moreover, where do you want to go? In my deep abstraction, after having used several times the door between the real and the invisible, I am convinced that I can generate, without betraying any of my relations with you (C, Zr, O, Sulfate), a novel specie C-Zr-SO4, with properties that you will be very proud to offer to Nature. Ok, okay, let's try it, but if in the meantime of the synthesis I feel the slightest physical or mental disturbance, I'll go with the oxygen and we will form zirconium oxide, stable and without alterations”. I had these dialogues, similar or different, with the Carbon atoms and the Sulfate ion. It was not easy, try to ask non-captive questions, with more than one answer possibility. While I was building them, at the beginning, I wrote, but since I crossed out everything the next day, I decided to keep them in my memory, after an exhaustive study of the mass and electronic nature of each atomic or subatomic particle. The strategy for me was clear, I have to put myself in the other's place, try to feel and respond as if I were the other, except that the other was not a human being. Nevertheless, as I tried to "humanize" them, the upcoming was fascinating for me. As a consequence of our work in the laboratory, we generated the special conditions to form this new species (or at least they were in my Symbolic Abstraction), we characterized it, we purified it and “EUREKA”, we obtained it and it is now described in the work already cited. This attribution ascribed to mass/energetic species, without neural systems (first probable inconsistency), led me after three years to conceive the Idea of Hidden Reality and to generate a possible mechanism (architecture), of how we think when our objective is to hit an “invisible target”, or to "create" new targets. Thus, using my constructs in the Hard Sciences and Epistemology and Semiotics, I have arrived at the hypothesis of the next suggestion of the mechanism of thought toward the occult reality. The synaptic energy goes from greater to lesser as we advance in the mechanism. In that sense, it is possible to start in the order described or not. My suggestion is to follow the order, as you will see below.pdfesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Visible realityHidden realityEpistemologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAnunziata, Oscar Alfredo.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/