Optimal design of a two-stage membrane system for hydrogen separation in refining processes.
Fecha
2018-10-31Autor
Arias, Ana Marisa
Mores, Patricia Liliana
Scenna, Nicolás José
Caballero, José Antonio
Mussati, Sergio Fabián
Mussati, Miguel Ceferino
0000-0002-6716-6633
0000-0001-6026-142X
0000-0002-1129-8725
0000-0001-6470-2907
0000-0002-4132-0292
0000-0002-6104-5179
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemResumen
This paper fits into the process system engineering field by addressing the optimization of a two-stage
membrane system for H2 separation in refinery processes. To this end, a nonlinear mathematical
programming (NLP) model is developed to simultaneously optimize the size of each membrane stage
(membrane area, heat transfer area, and installed power for compressors and vacuum pumps) and operating conditions (flow rates, pressures, temperatures, and compositions) to achieve desired target
levels of H2 product purity and H2 recovery at a minimum total annual cost. Optimal configuration and
process design are obtained from a model which embeds different operating modes and process
configurations. For instance, the following candidate ways to create the driving force across the
membrane are embedded: (a) compression of both feed and/or permeate streams, or (b) vacuum
application in permeate streams, or (c) a combination of (a) and (b). In addition, the potential selection
of an expansion turbine to recover energy from the retentate stream (energy recovery system) is also
embedded. For a H2 product purity of 0.90 and H2 recovery of 90%, a minimum total annual cost of
1.764 M$·year−1 was obtained for treating 100 kmol·h−1 with 0.18, 0.16, 0.62, and 0.04 mole fraction of
H2, CO, N2, CO2, respectively. The optimal solution selected a combination of compression and vacuum
to create the driving force and removed the expansion turbine. Afterwards, this optimal solution was
compared in terms of costs, process-unit sizes, and operating conditions to the following two suboptimal solutions: (i) no vacuum in permeate stream is applied, and (ii) the expansion turbine is included
into the process. The comparison showed that the latter (ii) has the highest total annual cost (TAC) value,
which is around 7% higher than the former (i) and 24% higher than the found optimal solution. Finally, a
sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of the desired H2 product purity and H2 recovery is
presented. Opposite cost-based trade-offs between total membrane area and total electric power were
observed with the variations of these two model parameters. This paper contributes a valuable decision support tool in the process system engineering field for designing, simulating, and optimizing membranebased systems for H2 separation in a particular industrial case; and the presented optimization resultsprovide useful guidelines to assist in selecting the optimal configuration and operating mode.
Colecciones
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia: